Marcin Feltynowski
ICT clusters diagnosis in Poland
Journal of European Economy, Volume 11, Issue 4, December 2012, pp. 403-415.
| JEL: F00, O31 | Full text (PDF) |
Irina Khomyn
Economic development in the context of the dichotomy of T.Veblen
Journal of European Economy, Volume 9, Issue 4, December 2010, pp.387-394
| JEL: O31, O39 |
Full text (PDF) |
|
The problem of analytical interpretation of indicators of economic development, which deals in international comparisons of their efforts in Ukraine was studied.
Key words: |
|
Taras Medvedkin
Innovation development of Ukraine in the conditions of technology transfer and S&T cooperation
Journal of European Economy, Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2008, pp.145-153
| JEL: O31, O39 |
Full text (PDF) |
|
The paper investigates the theoretical and practical aspects of the innovation activity in Ukraine in the context of international science and technology (S&T) cooperation.
|
|
Oksana Lyashenko
Maximizing inventor's profit in the process of invention commercialization based on the Nordhaus model
Journal of European Economy, Volume 6, Issue 4, December 2007, pp.455-465
| JEL: O31, O38 |
Full text (PDF) |
|
In this article, the author develops a model of inventor’s profit maximization in the process of commercializing an invention based on the critical analysis of the «optimal life of a patent» model offered by the American economist William Nordhaus. The author defines perspective directions for further modifications of the Nordhaus model for its application in the real economic conditions of Ukraine.
Key words: |
|
Teresa Bal-Wozniak
Reasons for insufficient innovation in the Polish economy
Journal of European Economy, Volume 5, Issue 4, December 2006, pp.367-398
| JEL: O31 |
Full text (PDF) |
In spite of the innovation’s permanent place in economics, it deserves a new look. Consequently, the level of innovativeness is the responsibility of the individual, the economic agent. The aim of the paper is to reflect on searches for answers to numerous questions touching on how? How can influence be exerted on individual’s level of innovativeness without being in conflict with natural processes to which he as a subject is subordinated? How can we arrive at such a situation where everyone, irrespective of position held or social and professional role played, would want, know and be able to undertake effective realization of innovative activity, taking advantage of the knowledge he possesses for beneficial purposes. How to achieve a given level of management of the individual’s innovativeness, which would guarantee an increase in corporate innovativeness, including the economy as a whole? How to merge marketing mechanisms with the facilitating role of the state in innovation management, so that they could satisfy demands of the globalizing economy that is based on knowledge and human capital? |
|